top of page
Gold Nanoparticles

ASPIRIN

Introduction

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is a medication used commonly for reduction in inflammation, and is known to be a blood thinner to prevent the clotting of blood. Aspirin can be synthesized in a laboratory environment.

Gold nanoparticles intro
Gold nanoparicles synthesis

How does aspirin work?

Aspirin is known to inhibit cyclooxygenase, this enzyme produces prostaglandins and thromboxanes. Through this inhibition, there is a reduction in prostaglandins in the body, along with thromboxanes which gives rise to a number of pharmacological properties which are used in the clinic.

 

Aspirin is known to have a number of properties, it can be used for pain and fever. This is done through the disruption of prostaglandins which are known to be irritating and cause headaches, along with pain when potent in the body. By disrupting the production of these prostaglandins, sensitivity of pain receptors, histamine and bradykinin is reduced. Hence, symptoms of pain can be reduced, along with fever as prostaglandins are also known to be extremely powerful fever inducing agents.

 

Aspirin is also able to inhibit platelet aggregation by interfering with thromboxane A2 in platelets. This protein has a large role in platelet aggregation. Thanks to this platelet aggregation inhibition aspirin in turn reduces risks of cardiovascular death in cases of myocardial infarction (MI), along with reducing risks of MI in patients, hence decreasing mortality rates in patients who have had prior MI. This property also allows for the reduction in risks of transient ischemic attacks (TIA) and prevention of thromboembolism post hip replacement surgery.

 

 

 


 

 

aspirin.png

Figure 1

Flowchart demonstrating the effect of Aspirin on Cyclooxygenase

Botulinum Toxin: Image

Evidence of Cancer Prevention and Mechanisms

The possible correlations between daily aspirin use and cancers have been confirmed by epidemiological research. Analysis has shown that daily aspirin intake can protect against the growth of some cancers, such as breast cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, and cancers of the prostate. Studies have found that daily NSAID intake, such as aspirin, will decrease the risk of colon cancer by about 60 percent, about 40 percent for prostate cancer, and about 36 percent for breast cancer. The studies also note that after at least 5 years of NSAID use, these results were more significant.

Several mechanisms have been hypothesized to describe the mechanisms required for aspirin to carry out its anti-cancer properties. The inhibition of platelet function by inactivating platelet’s COX-1 (Cyclooxygenase), is a plausible mechanism that explains aspirin’s actions. The explanation for this is that platelet-derived mediators allow crosstalk between cancer cells and surrounding cells, therefore inhibiting platelet production prevents the formation of platelet-derived mediators. In addition, tumorigenesis is caused due to the formation of the prostaglandin, PGE2 which is essential during invasion of cancer cells and creating a microenvironment favourable to the formation of tumours. Hence, the inhibition of PGE2 leads to reduced inflammation by aspirin and could therefore reduce the risk of tumour formation.

A study examined these mechanisms in relation to prostate cancer, and this study suggests that both COX1 and COX2 have protective effects. Aspirin is able to inhibit COX2 by inhibiting platelets required for the expression of the enzyme, which is usually high in prostate cancer. This is thought to have beneficial effects as a decrease in COX levels lead to a decrease in prostanoid production which avoids the decrease in apoptosis and increase in proliferation.

Botulinum Toxin: Text

Current research in the use of Aspirin for cancer prevention

Should we take aspirin to prevent cancer?

Currently aspirin is not used to treat cancer, this is as most of the evidence presented is observed through early clinical trials.

 

With regards to colorectal cancer aspirin is observed to prevent the development of the cancer from the predisposing Lynch syndrome. The article by Burn et al. (2020) describes how, of 427 patients having Lynch syndrome, 40 did not develop colorectal cancer over a 10 year period of treatment using aspirin.

 

In addition, the article by Rothwell et al. (2010) showed that the risk of developing colorectal cancer was reduced over the 10 year period of treatment but this required treatment using high doses of aspirin. The drawback to this method of treatment is that patients might be in greater risk of suffering bleeding complications, this limits the potential of aspirin as a treatment against colorectal cancer.

 

Hence, research shows that, with regards to colorectal cancer, aspirin is not as good a treatment as initially thought. This statement though requires further research to ensure and conclude whether aspirin may or may not be used as treatment. This is as aspirin is seen to be very effective when treating gastrointestinal cancers, as it is observed to reduce the risk of death by 54%.

 

The side effects of the use of aspirin as a treatment are dose dependent. It has been seen to cause gastrointestinal bleeding and gastric mucosal injury with both having a greater incidence as the dose of aspirin administered is increased. Additionally, aspirin treatment was also seen to reduce the secretion of gastric mucosal prostaglandins.

 

Where are we at in terms of its use in cancer prevention?

Aspirin is not currently being used clinically for cancer prevention or cure because there is a lot of conflicting research. A study followed 12,668 people for 14 years and the researchers discovered that taking aspirin decreased overall cancer (17%), breast cancer (30%), and trachea, bronchus, and lung cancer by a substantial amount (32%). However, in another study, in a 13-year randomized controlled trial they compared 19,934 women taking 100mg aspirin every other day with 19,942 women who took placebo. The researchers found that aspirin did not reduce cancer in any site. In another study, 146,113 individuals were instructed to take a minimum of 325mg of aspirin daily for more than 5 years and these people had a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer (19%) and colorectal cancer (32%).

Botulinum Toxin: Image

Aspirin as a Caloric Restriction Mimetic

The ability of cells to adapt to environmental and genetic insults decreases with age. The promotion of autophagy may decrease the rate of ageing and promote health span. Caloric restriction (CR) refers to the reduction in caloric intake without malnutrition. It has been observed that CR is able to counteract ageing-associated properties. However, it has been found difficult to apply CR to humans. Caloric restriction mimetics (CRMs) are pharmacological agents which mimic the biochemical properties of CR. They mainly result in an overall reduction of protein acetylation and in stimulation of autophagy. Aspirin and salicylate (the active metabolite of aspirin) are able to induce autophagy due to their ability to inhibit the acetyltransferase EP300. Salicylate acts as a competitive inhibitor, binding to the catalytic domain of EP300 instead of acetyl coenzyme A. Therefore, aspirin is able to act as an CRM.

 

What is Autophagy?

The process of autophagy is an evolutionary well-conserved process. This process occurs in all eukaryotic cells, from yeast cells to human cells. There are 3 main forms of autophagy; macro-autophagy, micro-autophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy. All three forms of autophagy involve lysosomal degradation. Macro-autophagy, which is also referred to as autophagy, is the most common form of autophagy.

 

Phagophores are synthesized at the endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial interface. The phagophores are then further elongated by the Golgi and plasma membranes. Once autophagy has been induced, any damaged cell organelles or proteins aggregates are isolated by phagophores. The phagophores eventually mature into autophagosomes, which are double membrane vesicles. The autophagosomes then fuse with acidic lysosomes to form autolysosomes, which degrade and recycle the damaged cell organelles and proteins aggregates.

 

Autophagy is an important housekeeping process that maintains cellular homeostasis. It has been shown, both under physiologic and pathologic conditions, how important this process is in maintaining cellular homeostasis.

 

How is Autophagy related to Ageing?

As stated earlier, autophagy is an important housekeeping process that maintains cellular homeostasis under normal and/or pathological conditions. Under stress conditions (such as nutrient deficiency), autophagy is activated to maintain proper cell function and promote cell survival. It has been observed that autophagy is altered in various ageing studies. Apart from this, the dysregulation of autophagy has been linked with a number of age-associated diseases.

 

Caloric restriction (CR) has diverse effects in counteracting ageing. However, the mechanisms which modulate such processes are still controversial. Recent studies have shown that the activation of autophagy has been linked to the beneficial anti-ageing effect and that CR induced a robust autophagy response in a number of metabolic tissues. It has also been observed that the inhibition of autophagy attenuated the anti-ageing effect of CR.

 

Caloric Restriction Mimetics (CRMs) as Autophagy Inducers

CRMs are drugs or compounds which are able to mimic the effect of CR, mainly the deacetylation of cytosolic proteins. The development of CRMs is based on the pathways and proteins that appear to be altered under CR conditions. Therefore, targets of CRMs include:

  • The glycolysis pathway

  • mTOR

  • EP300

  • AMPK

 

There are several drugs and other compounds which have been shown to be able to act as CRMs through a number of different mechanisms. CRMs can be divided into 3 classes based on their mode of action:

  • Direct inhibitors of protein acetyltransferases and inhibitors of autophagy repressor histone acetyltransferase EP300

  • Inhibitors of acetyl CoA biosynthesis

  • Activators of protein deacetylases, mainly sirtuin 1

 

How does Aspirin act as a CRM?

Studies have shown that aspirin and salicylate are able to activate autophagy through the inhibition of the enzymatic activity of EP300. Salicylate acts as a competitive inhibitor as it competes with acetyl CoA for binding to the catalytic domain of EP300. Through inhibition of EP300 and possible other acetyltransferases, aspirin inhibits the acetylation of cellular proteins and thus, induces autophagy. In animal models, it was also observed that treatment with aspirin can promote targeting of mitochondria to lysosomal degradation. This indicates that aspirin is able to stimulate mitophagy (selective degradation of mitochondria by autophagy) in vivo. It has been speculated, but further research needs to be carried out, that aspirin may mediate its anti-cancer effects via the induction of autophagy.

Botulinum Toxin: Text

Sources

Aspirin and cancer: Will a tablet a day keep tumors at bay? (2011). Harvard Men's Health Watch, 16(3), 1-4. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22135825
 

Bilani, N., Bahmad, H., & Abou-Kheir, W. (2017). Prostate cancer and aspirin use: Synopsis of the proposed molecular mechanisms. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 8 doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00145
 

Burn, J., Sheth, H., Elliott, F., Reed, L., Macrae, F., Mecklin, J., . . . Side, L. (2020). Cancer prevention with aspirin in hereditary colorectal cancer (lynch syndrome), 10-year follow-up and registry-based 20-year data in the CAPP2 study: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet (British Edition), 395(10240), 1855-1863. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30366-4
 

Castoldi, F., Pietrocola, F., Maiuri, M. C., & Kroemer, G. (2018). Aspirin induces autophagy via inhibition of the acetyltransferase EP300.Oncotarget, 9(37), 24574-24575. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.25364
 

Chung, K. W., & Chung, H. Y. (2019). The effects of calorie restriction on autophagy: Role on aging intervention. Nutrients, 11(12), 2923. doi:10.3390/nu11122923
 

Cryer, B., & Feldman, M. (1999). Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans. Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 117(1), 17-25. doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70545-7
 

Flower, R. (2003). What are all the things that aspirin does? BMJ, 327(7415), 572–573. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7415.572
 

Hall, M. N., Campos, H., Li, H., Sesso, H. D., Stampfer, M. J., Willett, W. C., & Ma, J. (2007). Blood Levels of Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, Aspirin, and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 16(2), 314–321. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0346
 

Harris, R. E., Beebe-Donk, J., Doss, H., & Burr Doss, D. (2005). Aspirin, ibuprofen, and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cancer prevention: A critical review of non-selective COX-2 blockade (review). Oncology Reports, 13(4), 559-583.
 

Huang, Edward S., MD, MPH, Strate, Lisa L., MD, MPH, Ho, Wendy W., MD, MPH, Lee, S. S., MD, & Chan, Andrew T., MD, MPH. (2011). Long-term use of aspirin and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. The American Journal of Medicine, 124(5), 426-433. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.12.022
 

Li, D., Wang, P., Yu, Y., Huang, B., Zhang, X., Xu, C., . . . Liu, C. (2018). Tumor-preventing activity of aspirin in multiple cancers based on bioinformatic analyses. PeerJ, 6 doi:10.7717/peerj.5667
 

Patrignani, P., & Patrono, C. (2016). Aspirin and cancer. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68(9), 967-976. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.083
 

Pietrocola, F., Castoldi, F., Maiuri, M. C., & Kroemer, G. (2018). Aspirin-another caloric-restriction mimetic. Autophagy, 14(7), 1162-1163. doi:10.1080/15548627.2018.1454810
 

Pietrocola, F., Castoldi, F., Markaki, M., Lachkar, S., Chen, G., Enot, D. P., . . . Kroemer, G. (2018). Aspirin recapitulates features of caloric restriction. Cell Reports, 22(9), 2395-2407.doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.024
 

Rothwell, P. M., Wilson, M., Elwin, C. E., Norrving, B., Algra, A., Warlow, C. P., & Meade, T. W. (2010). Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. Retrieved from http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/1927/
 

Silagy, C. A., McNeil, J. J., Donnan, G. A., Tonkin, A. M., Worsam, B., & Campion, K. (1993). Adverse effects of low-dose aspirin in a healthy elderly population. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 54(1), 84-89. doi:10.1038/clpt.1993.115
 

Thun, M. J., Jacobs, E. J., & Patrono, C. (2012). The role of aspirin in cancer prevention. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 9(5), 259-267. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.199
 

Tsoi, K. K., Ho, J. M., Chan, F. C., & Sung, J. J. (2019). Long‐term use of low‐dose aspirin for cancer prevention: A 10‐year population cohort study in Hong Kong. International Journal of Cancer, 145(1), 267-273. doi:10.1002/ijc.32083
 

Vane, J. ., & Botting, R. . (2003). The mechanism of action of aspirin. Thrombosis Research, 110(5-6), 255–258. doi:10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00379-7

bottom of page